On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Holger Levsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > (trimmed some people who I know are subscribed to the lists...) > > On Montag, 30. März 2009, Edward Cherlin wrote: >> If some of the people in this discussion want to produce a book on >> Debian packaging for Sugar (the whole world of Debian packaging is too >> big for one book), there would be three phases. > > I'm actually not convinced this is sensible, as there is good documentation > how to package for debian (and ubuntu) and a trimmed down document would > either have to link to the "real documentation" or be incomplete... that > said, I would definitly cheers such efforts if the result is usuable, it's > just that I dont expect a shorter result and thus I'd just duplication of > existing work. But anyway, if someone has that itch to scratch, by all means > go! > > Maybe the documents Jonas has started will become such a thing and I just dont > see it yet. > > Anyway. > >> Should we start with a Sugar project at alioth, in the Education >> section of the project tree? > > Currently all sugar packages are part of the collab-maint project on alioth, > which has the nice advantage that any Debian developer is automatically a > member and can commit and non DDs can get access easily too. > > I'd just suggest to change the structure, currently there is: > > collab-maint/sugar-pippy > collab-maint/sugar-chat > and so on > > to: > > collab-maint/sugar/sugar-pippy > collab-maint/sugar/sugar-chat > ... > > Jonas, what do you think?
I wonder if we should try to maintain a distinction between sugar core, what we call glucose, and sugar activities, fructose. (Not that we need to use those names, but having some distinction in the directory structure. > regards, > Holger > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
