14/12/2010 15:17, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 02:53:47PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >>> Hi, in my experience kdenlive and openshot are the way to go, I can't >>> comment on pitivi since I didn't use it for a while. If you don't >>> know openshot it's definitely worth a try. >> >> Thanks for the input. Did not know about openshot at all. The bugs >> reported in <URL: http://bugs.debian.org/src:openshot > make me worry >> if it works in Debian, though. Do you experience the same problems? > > I don't experience any of those problems. I suspect they are related to > the use of debian-multimedia.org packages which are known to be > problematic. All bugreports but the one regarding translations have > melt and python-mlt libs installed from that unofficial archive! > > > - Jonas >
I don't experience any of the issues discussed in the bugs, and I use debian-multimedia. I use the Sid version though (1.2.2-1). Some bug reports mention Ubuntu packages, another a mlt version compiled against a non-standard python version... I used it this afternoon (Oslo time) to edit three rushes (1280x700, about 400Mo each, .mov) and stitch them together, with transitions, and I didn't experience any problem. I do have a fairly long wish-list for Openshot but no problem with it lately. Cinelerra, Blender (whichever crashes less at the time) are my main tools for true HD, I like kdenlive and Openshot for quick and easy jobs, and I "trained" my wife to use it for her school related videos, she liked it better than kdenlive (something about the UI being simpler). Personally I am more a kdenlive type of guy ;-) . It's good to have all those options, looking a few years back video editing was a nightmare in Linux, it has been going in the right direction. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
