[RalfGesellensetter - Wednesday, March 30, 2011 7:16 AM] > Dear Oded, > > thanks for your mediating approach ;) > > Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2011 schrieb Oded Naveh: >> I don't understand why would there be an dhcpd on an LTSP? > > There used to be dhcpd on eth1 (192.168.0.254) to serve thin > clients on a separate network.
Thanks Ralf, I didn't know that, probably because I never used a separate LTSP server. I assumed an LTSP server will propagate request to tjener, bah. That seems to be at the root of the misunderstanding on my part because I never had problem running/configuring disklesses on the 192.168.0.0/24 as I was only using one dhcpd.conf. >> I believe there should only be one - system wide. Still do. >> For all I know tjener (what ever that means, I take it for main) has >> been > > Tjener is the Norwegian transliteration for "Server" or even > "Servant", AFAIK. Thanks again. Odd. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3B7DA8D819DF46F79721E12961BC83BA@static00
