Hi, On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > So we could stick with the Debian definition of armhf and still get it > working with Raspbian.
no.
we shall use "armel" instead of "armhf". While armel is not optimized for the
raspberrypi, these packages can be used there.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
