On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 10:53:38PM +0000, Mike Gabriel wrote: >> Hi Petter, hi Mattia, > > ah, thanks for CCing me, since I'm not subscribed to the -edu@ list. I forgot > to > mention so in my first email. > But i guess you and Petter are subscribed, so I won't CC you. Please tell me > whether you'd prefer me being subscribed. > >> On So 07 Jun 2015 21:16:31 CEST, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >> >I'm interested in this automatic timetabling software, and have often >> I shyly raise my arm here. > > YAY! > Two DD interested is great anyway, whatever they can actually do :) > That means the bus factor is rasonably lower. And even if this is not due to a > bus but just to me being more interested in staring at a beer (rather than > drinking it) than in keeping the package updated. > >> Please let me know what you have done, what you plan to do, what you can do >> and what you can't do. > > I actually did nothing than looking at the package state. > From my pov these are the following steps: > > 1) checking against the MIA db whether the process started or the person is > really MIA (not being a DD means i don't have access to quantz) > 2) If yes I'd do a "co-hijack", that is, uploading a package adding ourselves > to > Uploaders: > 3) if you ack (and someone do the 1) i can then run `gbp import-dscs > --debsnap` > to get a working place and upload that to collab-maint (if someone disagree > to using git then, meh, i'm sorry, dunno what to do ;)) > 4) i can do the work needed this first time, namely: > * update the package to last upstream release > https://bugs.debian.org/759229 > * update the description https://bugs.debian.org/759227 > * add the homepage field https://bugs.debian.org/765556 > * rewrite d/rules to use dh(1) > * check the build process and > + verify the hardening build flags are ok > + include whatever is someone left out https://launchpad.net/bugs/1404027 > * fix old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file lintian warning > 5) it's on my plan for the future experimenting with cme(1). "Unfurtunatly" > all > my packages already have a d/copyright already up-to-date using dep5 and > messing with cme on such already done changelog seems just loosing time. > Yet, > i am interested in learning+experimenting with that tool and this package > seems perfect (no dep5 copyright, few files with few licenses). So i'm > willing to rewrite the d/copyright (far future, might also be after dc15) > > > This is my general plan.
well, also all done: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/fet.git looks like cme is not quite ready, and this software is made up by only two persons that can share a single copyright entry. meh. Anyway, imho it's just ready as-is, feel free to do whatever you want now ;) Goodbye o/ -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB more about me: http://mapreri.org Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri Ubuntu Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MattiaRizzolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cahkymevchzp16r_hwe5ib2uq13aa8gppp3jsv-g7vf1ue--...@mail.gmail.com
