Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:12:53 +0000 with message-id <20160919111253.ga25...@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: Bug#836912: Packages.gz checksum on DebianEdu Sqeeze repository broken has caused the Debian Bug report #836912, regarding Packages.gz checksum on DebianEdu Sqeeze repository broken to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 836912: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836912 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: debian-edu-config Tags: squeeze User: email@example.com Usertags: debian-edu > on 02.09.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Holger Levsen: > > what still surprises me, is why the cache had wrong info at all, as a > packages checksum *never* changes… and why it was correct for > sha512sums, but wrong for all the other checksums. In follow up to bug #83610 we found another issue with the DebianEdu repositories: The initial bug was about issues with differences between the real hashes and the hashes given in the Packages file in DebianEdu Wheezy repository. That one was solved. With the current squeeze repsitory the packages are fine and have been fine for long time now. But after fixing the bug 836310 it looks like there is now a small issue with the hashes with the squeeze packages list itself: apt does complain about the hash checksum of http://ftp.skolelinux.org/skolelinux/dists/squeeze/local/binary-amd64/Packages.gz when trying to update the squeeze installation. This is a problem for people who didn't do updates yet and/or are willing to upgrade. With apt complaining about the checksums, there is now valid way pulling the latest packages from the squeeze repository. Thank you all Peter -- Peter Dreuw Berater Tel.: +49 2166 9901-155 Fax: +49 2166 9901-100 E-Mail: peter.dr...@credativ.de gpg fingerprint: 33B0 82D3 D103 B594 E7D3 53C7 FBB6 3BD0 DB32 ED41 http://www.credativ.de/ credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080 USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209 Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Peter, sorry for the delay… until today I had no idea what could have caused this… On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:39:23AM +0200, Peter Dreuw wrote: > In follow up to bug #83610 we found another issue with the DebianEdu > repositories: > > The initial bug was about issues with differences between the real > hashes and the hashes given in the Packages file in DebianEdu Wheezy > repository. That one was solved. > > With the current squeeze repsitory the packages are fine and have been > fine for long time now. But after fixing the bug 836310 it looks like > there is now a small issue with the hashes with the squeeze packages > list itself: as what I did to fix wheezy was excactly what I'd do to fix squeeze, but doing it again wouldnt make sense… Today I realized the cause: when fixing wheezy I left squeeze set to "untouchable", and this was the reason the checksums were wrong now… I've fixed this now by updating all indexes and finally setting all old suites to "untouchable" again, can you please confirm this is the case?! -- cheers, Holger
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---