Hi, so while I don't think (anymore) that the space wins are really worth removing this package, I still think we should go head with the removal, see below.
But first, this is how much space we gain: 4,0K debian-edu-artwork_0.902-3.dsc 4,0K debian-edu-artwork_0.903-1_amd64.changes 4,0K debian-edu-artwork_0.903-1.dsc 12K debian-edu-artwork_0.902-3_amd64.buildinfo 12K debian-edu-artwork_0.903-1_amd64.buildinfo 24K debian-edu-artwork_0.902-3.debian.tar.xz 24K debian-edu-artwork_0.903-1.debian.tar.xz 28K debian-edu-artwork_0.902-3_all.deb 28K debian-edu-artwork_0.903-1_all.deb 444K debian-edu-artwork-lines_0.902-3_all.deb 444K debian-edu-artwork-lines_0.903-1_all.deb 1,8M debian-edu-artwork-softwaves_0.902-3_all.deb 1,8M debian-edu-artwork-softwaves_0.903-1_all.deb 6,2M debian-edu-artwork-spacefun_0.902-3_all.deb 8,0M debian-edu-artwork_0.903.orig.tar.xz 15M debian-edu-artwork_0.902.orig.tar.xz So, 7mb in the source package. And 6mb is indeed neclectable, given we install at least several hundreds of MBs… But, re-reading #766313 made me reconsider: in this bug it was suggested to generate spacefun png's from spacefun's .svg's during package build. That was deemed as not possible as the .svg's were previously generated from the .png's because the original SVGs were *lost*, thus such svg would be worse quality… IOW: we have spacefun in stretch because we were lax with copyright requirements. This was 3 years ago and the problem is actually older. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765981#25 So I'm not willing to spend time anymore on this very old artwork which only has one (vocal, active and nice!) user. Sorry. -- cheers, Holger
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
