On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:24:17 -0300 Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we go this route, please at least pretend we can do feature checks. > That is, hide the implementation in an appropriately named > check-for-feature function which then has nothing but a case statement > for models. That way, if we do find a better way, we can change it to > do a proper check.
Hmm, didn't finish this thought properly ... ... That way, if we do find a better way later, we can change the feature check function to do a proper check with no additional changes throughout the rest of the code (i.e. we enjoy the benefits of encapsulation). Ben _______________________________________________ Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel
