Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| oz, Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:51:16PM +0200 |=-
>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:17:44 +0100
>> "Phil Endecott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> > Can anyone explain why the existing code is like it is?  Why do we need 
>> > to remove and re-load the pciehp module at all?
>> 
>> Good question. Pciehp (hotplug-module) seems to be unnecessary on the
>> 901. I deleted those entries in the toggle-on section, and wireless.sh
>> work as good as before for me and is pretty simple now:
>
> I guess you mean that unloading/reloading pciehp is not necessary and 
> I agree with that.
>
> OTOH, I giess there was a reason for it to be that way. If 701 owners 
> can test that the simplification below (or a subset of it) works for 
> them, I'd be happy to change the code.

I really hope that this stuff is still sufficiently "new" that we can 
find out why it was put there!  Is there a commit message somewhere?  A 
few comments would have been nice too....

> At least on 901, if the whole wireless-on section is replaced solely 
> with the echo 1 > $wlan_control toggling wireless on works here (901, 
> bios 1101).

It almost works for me; I need to "ifup" and "ifdown" I think because I 
don't have "auto" in my /etc/network/interfaces.    I do have 
"allow-hotplug" though.  I need to understand that better.  But I 
certainly don't seem to need all that module loading/unloading.

>>     off|disable)
>>         if [ $(cat $wlan_control) = 1 ]; then
>>             detect_wlan
>>             ifdown --force $WLAN_IF
>>             modprobe -r $WLAN_MOD
>>             echo 0 > $wlan_control
>>
> I guess the same approach can be taken here - stop fiddling with 
> modprobe and let pciehp handle the removal of the hardware via 
> $wlan_control.

Running ifdown while the network is still up, before disabling it, 
allows things like the scripts in /etc/network/if-down.d to run.  
People might have useful stuff in there.  But I don't see any need for 
the modprobe -r, and it works for me without it.

(BTW, is there a good reason why we don't rename the wireless interface 
to a consistent hardware-independent name like wlan0 or wifi0, rather 
than needing all the detect_wlan stuff?)

>> Do you use any kind of network-manager?

I don't.


Phil.





_______________________________________________
Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel

Reply via email to