On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -=| Santi Béjar, Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 06:24:53PM +0200 |=- >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Santi Béjar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Sure, but I would prefer to speed up the resume stage as I use it more >> > often. >> > Currently it spends ~15s (not sure, as I don't have my 701 here). >> > Do you know how can I debug it? I've activated the pm-utils logging >> > and it runs in less than one second. I've used bootchartd to record >> > what is running, but it is resumed too late to debug it. >> >> I've found that pciehp is taking a lot of time. It is better removing >> it before the suspend, and loading it afterwards. It goes from 14.5 >> sec to 8.5. I have this in /etc/pm/config.d/local: >> >> SUSPEND_MODULES="ath-pci pciehp" > > Adding SUSPEND_MODULES="pciehp" improves resume time on 901 too. Since > 901s don't have ath-pci, adding that too won't have any ill effects on > them.
Sorry, the ath-pci in SUSPEND_MODULES is not related to the pciehp, I need it regardles of the pciehp. But I don't think it hurts in general. > > Any objections against adding a /etc/pm/config.d/eeepc file to > eeepc-acpi-scripts? For me, OK. Santi > > -- > dam JabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkjyKjAACgkQHqjlqpcl9jv5kACguxCCY3BhdUhx/FD48FJvly0s > nygAnjPM66j/s0t0XV7qqQneP4wNZUP/ > =AMRR > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel > > _______________________________________________ Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel
