Il giorno lun, 18/05/2009 alle 07.33 -0700, Fabien ha scritto: > Does anybody could explain me if there is a real difference (i.e visible by > me as a end user) between using 2.6.26 or 2.6.29 kernel on a 701 4G. > > I've tried both, and I don't see visible differences.
The most "visible difference" should be enabling modesetting and updating Xorg to the sid version. You will have a 800x480 console (instead of stretched 640x480) and, it appears, great RAM savings in X applications. > In fact, I've tried to reduce my boot time (by appling advices found in the > web) and I'd like to know if installing a new kernel can reset some settings, > how to check what is done by a .deb package in synaptic before installing it. > > I will do some boot test with bootchart and if anybody is interested, I can > post here some links to results. I noticed small gains in boot time, but huge gains in hibernate time, and perfect support for suspend and hibernate (in 1000HE and 900). With 2.6.26, sometimes, I had glitches on resume from RAM. Bye. -- Alessandro Pellizzari _______________________________________________ Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel
