Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:52:40 +0200
Thiemo Nagel <[email protected]> wrote:
If we remove this, we'll probably break things for some etch users who
run eeepc-acpi-scripts from unstable. Therefore I'd suggest to add
logic to detect the kernel version and only remove the special treatment
for kernels >= 2.6.30. Yes, that'll add more cruft, but otherwise we
might ruin the experience for people running mixed systems.
That may be, but we never supported etch and always recommended lenny,
even before it was released. I wouldn't go to herculean efforts to
support it without a specific request from an etch user, and even then
I would like to hear their justification for not running lenny.
Substitute etch by lenny (my fault), and the argumentation still holds.
There will be plenty of lenny users running eeepc-acpi-scripts from
unstable. (I'm one of them.)
Kind regards,
Thiemo
--
+-----------------------------------+--------------------------+
| Dipl.-Phys. Thiemo Nagel | |
| Technische Universitaet Muenchen | Room PH1 3276 |
| Physik-Department E18 | |
| James-Franck-Strasse | Phone +49 89 289-12379 |
| D-85747 Garching | Fax +49 89 289-12570 |
+-----------------------------------+--------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel
