Dear Frédéric,

Am Mittwoch, den 02.12.2009, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Frédéric Boiteux:
> Le Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:24:10 +0000,
> Paul Menzel <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> > I would also recommend to use testing/Squeeze or unstable/Sid. The
> > chances that testing breaks something are pretty small. So if it works
> > when you set it up it should not break so badly afterward doing
> > 
> >     sudo aptitude update && sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
> > 
> > every once in a while, that she is not able to repair it.
> 
> Ok, I'll go with Squeeze (or perhaps Sid if Gnome env. is always in
> transition…)
> 
> > 
> > KMS, Grub2, Ext4 and for example an up to date LXDE are pretty strong
> > reasons to go for testing/Squeeze.
> 
> I'll try LXDE to see if it's more useful on this tiny screen.
> 
> > Do not forget about Boot Booster [1] and maybe a self-compiled Linux
> > kernel to speed up boot time. But most of this is mentioned in the
> > Debian Wiki I guess.
> Thanks for the tip, I note it !

I am facing a similiar situation as you now. Could you please post an
update on what you did in the end and how the user experience is?


Thanks,

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

_______________________________________________
Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel

Reply via email to