On 19/11/10 06:02 AM, Luca Niccoli wrote: > Thanks, I didn't know that eeepc-wmi used different sysfs paths.
There are more of these to fix, but my commit conflicted with the one you just made so I have to sort it out now ... > The - had to go, fix committed. > I got confused by a hack we used to shift button names to $3 before. > As for the other parameters, I'm simulating the command line acpid is > passing to hotkey.sh, just in case. Well, that hack was apparently used *instead of* passing 'hotkey' not in addition to. So is it really correct to change $3 to $2 as you have just done? I don't think so ... $2 will just be 'hotkey'. >> Also, I have the slight problem now that a few keys don't generate >> button events *or* hotkey events now (but I'll have to take that up with >> upstream). > > I wonder if there are appropriate button events for all the keys, and > if that's the reason eeepc_laptop is sticking to hotkeys. Upstream can make those keys do whatever he wants, so I don't think this is the reason. Ben _______________________________________________ Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel
