Changwoo Ryu wrote: > > Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>>>> On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 17:58:56 +0900 > > >>>>> "TK" == [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > > > > TK> Humm.. it's ad-hoc fix... > > TK> Just modified MIN(1900 to 1970) and MAX(1999 to 2069) of year. > > > > TK> I think that it is nonsense but better than "00 is 1900". > > > > Anyway, we have no time to the Y2K. > > I'll upload emacs19 and emacs20 to slink. > > > > (We got the Y2K in Japan, a happy new year!) > > I think it is never an urgent thing to fix. > > And I still doubt whether it's better to say the year XY (XY < 70) as > 20XY. Is it better to say "the year 68 is 2068", than "the year 68 is > 1968"? someone read the userfriendly comic today :-) since 1k=1024 --> y2k=2048
LOL
