Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2005-12-09 20:33:11 +0100 Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:12:03 +0100 >>> From: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Cc: Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected], >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], >>> [email protected] >>> >>>> Don't know whether I should put :-) or :-( here... >>> I would rather like useful comments than shit like that. >> If you continue to be rude like this, you won't hear anything at >> all. > > He started it by not having read the information i gave carefully.
I don't think that rude language is a useful aid to understanding, and Kim certainly did not "start it", where "it" means anything close to using four-letter words. If you consider "not reading carefully" on the part of Kim an equal offense to your choice of words, you either have strange ideas of conduct, or you consider him quite less deserving of respect than yourself. Even if this happened to be the case, letting it show is not conducive to further cooperation, and a somewhat more diplomatic approach would seem more expedient. > What did he want to say anyways? It would appear to obvious to me after reading the information he gave carefully, that he wanted to express his opinion that releasing something from an unstable branch does not sound like the best idea. If I were to adopt your standards of discussion, I should probably use rude language for pointing out that I considered this obvious from what Kim wrote. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
