Le mercredi 04 octobre 2006 16:28, David Kastrup a écrit : > > The text here differentiates between "invariant sections" and > "Invariant Sections", seemingly calling the Cover Texts, even though > the GFDL permits adding to them, an "invariant section" which happens > not to be the same as an "Invariant Section" defined by the GFDL.
I think I did pay attention to this at that moment, thanks. > The wording clearly is fuzzy enough to cause confusion, yet I think > that the gist of the resolution is clear: requiring cover texts of "A > GNU manual" and "You are free to copy and modify this GNU Manual." on > mass-printed copies (never mind that the GPL, in contrast, does not > even make mass-printing feasible), as spelled out by the GNU project > maintainer guidelines at > <URL:http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices.html#Licens >e-Notices> will make Debian consider the documentation non-free and act > accordingly. I guess that not being able to rename or remove "A GNU Manual" makes impossible to make a derivative manual. > Those two sentences are all that it takes to declare the documentation > of every GNU project following the GNU maintainer guidelines > unsuitable for Debian main. This is right. I just realized that. I guess the future SFDL will exist to avoid such issues. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
