Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:19:24 +0200, Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Maybe you should ask that question to the publishers who refused >>> printing GNU manuals under simpler licenses. There is a _reason_ >>> that the GFDL was created. > >> Why doesn't the FSF ask them that question? > > They probably did, which is probably what contributed to the writing of > the GFDL. I don't think that the FSF created the GFDL by guessing at > what the problems were. > > Mind you, if David is claiming that publishers have problems with the > GPL, then I think that it is up to him to back up those claims by > stating what the problems are.
Cf. <URL:http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/why-gfdl.html> Again, if you think that you need more information, it is your task to research it rather than revert to spreading FUD. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
