David Bremner <[email protected]> writes:
> Normally I'm in favour of each upstream elpa package being a debian > binary package, but I wonder if these needs (initially) to generate so > many binary packages. elpa-rtags makes sense as a binary package, since > at least one other package in melpa (malinka) depends on it. The others > might be groupable into one binary package. I'm not sure if that would > introduce significate maintenance overhead. I guess it would require the maintence of a fake rtags-something-pkg.el file to convince dh_elpa that the various .el's belong together. At the moment I'm not sure if that's a good tradeoff or not.
