Hi Sean, Вт 18 дек 2018 @ 17:31 Sean Whitton <[email protected]>:
> On Sat 08 Dec 2018 at 11:16am +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote: > >> Пт 07 дек 2018 @ 18:46 Sean Whitton <[email protected]>: >>> >>> To confirm, are you saying that MELPA has added Package-Version headers, >>> overriding the Version: headers from upstream, such that everything in >>> 2.4? What about the libs in your MELPA list that are 1.0? >> >> Yes, at least in stable MELPA. And these are the only differences. >> Please, find the diff between the original source and stable MELPA >> attached. > > Thanks, but could you answer my second question too? As I wrote in my first message, all packages in stable MELPA contain Package-Version with value "2.4", except use-package itself. The use-package itself is distributed by stable MELPA as tar archive without any Package-Version declaration in its contents., but use-package.el and use-package-core.el declare Version 2.4. More specifically it is as follows: use-package.tar, 2.4 (no Package-Version declaration): use-package-bind-key.el, 1.0 use-package-core.el, 2.4 use-package-delight.el, 1.0 use-package-diminish.el, 1.0 use-package-ensure.el, 1.0 use-package-jump.el, 1.0 use-package-lint.el, 1.0 use-package.el, 2.4 Cheers! Lev
