Hello, The reference to dh_elpa actually means dh-make-elpa. It would be good to test dh-make-elpa against the new dh-make-perl in experimental.
-- Sean Whitton -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:49:50 +0100 From: gregor herrmann <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: RF{C,H}: dh-make-perl Message-ID: <[email protected]>
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 14:25:21 -0300, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:35:55 -0300, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > - rebased post-buster onto master (fixed merge conflicts and then
> > removed them in an interactice rebase), so now post-buster is
> > basically <!nocheck>, with a history of master plus the few commits
> > on top. Will force-push after a review here on the table … And done
> > now.
> And post-buster rebased and force-pushed again.
After some reviews and tests at the Bruxelles MiniDebCamp and the
Laveno-Mombello SnowCamp, I've now merged the post-buster branch into
master and uploaded it to experimental.
experimental because I'd like to again call for tests:
- The new features are
* (some) test-only build-dependencies get a <!nocheck> tag
* arch:any package get build-dependencies on perl:native and
perl-xs-dev for cross-buildability
- Please try to refresh existing and create new packages with the new
release.
- And if you are involved in dh_elpa (Sean, David), please see if the
new dh-make-perl breaks anything.
I think I'll wait for a week or so before considering an upload to
unstable.
Thanks again to the friendly testers at the above mentioned events!
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
`. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
-------------------- End of forwarded message --------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
