Source: auto-install-el
Version: 1.58-1.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Takaya Yamashita <[email protected]>, [email protected], 
Davide Prina <[email protected]>, Debian Emacsen team 
<[email protected]>, Package Salvaging Team 
<[email protected]>

Hi,

today the package auto-install-el was a candidate for the bug of the day[1].

I noticed that bug #974720 looks easy to fix, but I'm wondering whether
this package is still needed in Debian today.  This is an honest
question - if the answer is yes, I'd be happy to help fix the bug and
possibly migrate the package to Salsa for easier maintenance.  I just
want to make sure my time is well spent, so I'd like to hear others'
opinions first.

Kind regards
    Andreas.

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks#bug-of-the-day

-- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.16.9+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Reply via email to