Eli Zaretskii [25/Jun 6:17pm +03] wrote: > Numbers to back the impression that "our NN.1 releases always feel > like they take longer than we would like". Can you take the part of > etc/HISTORY since Emacs 26.1 and tell what kind of schedule you'd like > to see instead?
Emphasis on the "feel" -- I didn't mean to claim that they actually do take longer than is reasonable, my point was that they feel like they do. >> We could say that we stop doing this as soon as the next branch is cut. > > Sorry: stop doing what? I meant: if we were to go with the plan where we continue to install all safe fixes on the release branch, we could stop making new (non-critical) point releases from it at the point at which we cut the new release branch. > The main point, I think, is this: will keeping the release branch > alive for longer delay the start of the release cycle for NN+1.1? It > might do that for reasons of manpower and resources we have, if > nothing else. I agree that this is the main point. It would be good to have some others chime in, I'm really not sure myself. -- Sean Whitton
