>> - - bad default for crossbase (it *should* be /usr, there is no point >> to make it different unless toolchain is able to handle that) - this >> may be fixed immidiatly
This is already commited > FWIW, I've always wished dpkg supported relative paths; for instance > $BIN/foo or $LIB/bar.1.so > ... > Since $CROSSINC would be resolved when packages were installed, instead > of when they were built, one package could support different > configurations of $CROSSINC, $CROSSBASE, etc. What you write about seems to be a major change in debian packaging system. Although it may be useful, I doubt such a change will be accepted by debian in forseable future. As for dpkg-cross, I'll try to keep it consistent with other packaging tools. Sorry. Nikita
