> I think it is better to add "unset NAME" construction to configuration > file, that will unset an individual variable in current > mode/package/scope. I hope it will work on package basis. Or will it be possible to unset on scope and mode basis too?
> I was goind to add it long ago, but still didn't actually add the code. > I may try to add it this evening. Put this into your consideration. dpkg-cross define today a bunch of variables. Nobudy really know which ones are defined without review the sources (Ore are those documented in man pages?) If we will introduce new variables old cross-compile scripts won't work because new introduced variables have to be "unset" by the developer afterwards. If we would say that _all_ variables are unset by dpkg-cross future introductions of vairables would not affect old cross-compile configurations. This is one advantage of this approach. I'm very interested on your modifications. -- Raphael Bossek -- +++ GMX DSL-Tarife 3 Monate gratis* +++ Nur bis 25.7.2004 +++ Bis 24.000 MB oder 300 Freistunden inkl. http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
