Hi, Today's quiestion is: what is the attitude/opinions upon diverting dpkg-architecture from dpkg-cross package? The thing is that we (in slind) use some architecture names that are missing from upstream dpkg archtable and we are currently keeping our locally forked version of dpkg for that very reason that I personally dislike. And I'm in the mood for changing this unless there are some reasons not to do so.
Alternatively, is there any chance we can get a number of uclibc-* architectures into mainstream dpkg? [archname-related flame discouraged] Regards, -- I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
