On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:59:55 +0000
Wookey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Right. I did wonder if the requirement was really 'run apt-cross first'.

I'm testing now, there do appear to be a few gremlins in the
"fresh-install" first run.

> Just trying a naive "apt-cross -u" sets things up for unstable, but
> emsetup still looks for -testing.
>
> apt-cross -u -S testing
> emsetup
>
> works (aprt from whinging about authentication). Is the idea of the
> current script that it takes the targetted suite from the suite on the
> host? Perhaps it makes no sense to try to guress a suite?

Maybe. My current test box is running testing so I should be able to
fix that. The authentication whinging is also fixable.

> I'll try and find a mo next week to work out what is actually needed,
> but I suspect you'll get to it first.

Hopefully.

> I saw that in the docs. Assuming 'arm' seems to me to be the wrong
> option (even though it is very convenient for me). Surely if no arch
> has been specified then it should just insist on one being specified
> somewhere, and halt.

OK.

That's one of the gremlins in "fresh-install" so I'll fix that too.

--


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

Attachment: pgp81CP15NvOA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to