Forwarding to emdebian for input ----- Forwarded message from Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]> -----
From: Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:00:31 +0100 Subject: Re: Bug#317344: [Patch] make build-essential use an empty list for unofficial archs Cc: [email protected] To: Loïc Minier <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux, no MULE) X-Sender: [email protected] X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/YFUsr81e8e8O8IPCjOB0MHM+GkVVhMLmuVeb0 TfcH8AHiwMQFwYfc72MXiT+QQNeL9ttE5gbBZ9HjutaAi9ZwCi EqevSbDgA= Loïc Minier <[email protected]> writes: > Hey > > Quite an old bug... > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005, Goswin Brederlow wrote: >> * make-esslist.sh: Download Release file and use Architectures field > > So I'm not sure looking at the Release file is more correct than the > dpkg archtable; the latter seems more authoritative and stable than a > potentially stripped down list from a mirror. > >> * make-esslist.sh: Add special case for amd64.debian.net > > not needed anymore :-) > >> * Makefile.am: Use essential-packages-list-empty for unknown archs > > I think this was fixed there: > > build-essential (11.1) unstable; urgency=low > > * If the source doesn't ship with an essential-package-list for the > building architecture, create an empty one instead of failing. > > -- Scott James Remnant <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:27:01 +0100 > > May this bug be closed? > > Cheers, > -- > Loïc Minier Nohing against it from my side. But maybe check with emdebian if they still have problems with it for unlisted archs. MfG Goswin ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
