thanks. good job

2010/11/28 Neil Williams <[email protected]>

> OK, the server is something like available and the DNS has been
> updated, so it should start to resolve over the next few hours. (On my
> connection, it already does but then that could be a somewhat
> artificial test.)
>
> Problems:
>
> 1. Grip packages need further improvements. There are likely to be
> missing dependencies, the latest Lenny 5.0.7 point release does not
> exist yet. Squeeze and Sid should be mostly OK but the entire repo has
> had to be rebuilt, so there may be some inconsistencies. Please don't
> do serious build stuff with the current repository (i.e. don't base a
> release on anything in Grip currently). Even Lenny needs fixes/checks.
>
> 2. Crush 1.0 has been recovered, only for ARM and only for Lenny.
>
> 3. Toolchains for amd64/lenny have been included, Hector has got more
> to upload later.
>
> 4: SVN browser links do not exist yet. (Trac is installed, not
> configured)
>
> 5: SVN itself isn't yet public, anonymous or developer. (So those links
> on the website is out of date.)
>
> 6: The mirroring needs to be reconfigured and isn't running yet.
>
> I won't have time to do anything more on this for a few days
> (away at conference). If there are particular problems with Grip, file a
> bug against buildd.emdebian.org, if there are broken links in the
> website, those will need to wait until SVN is fixed. Other issues
> (like Trac, SVN), ask Wookey or Hector.
>
> Note: those who have emdebian SVN checkouts are going to have issues.
> We lost all SVN history in the recovery process and it isn't likely
> that svn switch is going to be able to cope with going backwards from
> rev 7800 to 280. We'll see but it may have to be that the old stuff
> will have to be moved aside. Any SVN experts out there who know if svn
> merge -c could be used? The path will have changed but whether a switch
> and a reverse merge can be combined in a single call....
>
> The history which does now exist is simply built from the svn tags
> which were retained in the working copy, so changesets in the emdebian
> scripts packages are simply between tagged versions. It turns out that
> most version increments had been tagged.
>
> --
>
>
> Neil Williams
> =============
> http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
>
>


--

Reply via email to