Hi, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:10:55PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>> This is a shot in the dark but I diff'ed Config.pm and Config_heavy.pl >> between armel and armhf rootfs and found that the armhf versions, in >> contrast to the armel ones were lacking entries like >> /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi and /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi in libpth or >> libspath and other variables connected to shared library paths. > > perl was recently rebuilt on the official architectures because of > multiarch directory changes. This should be done on armhf too if it has > libc6 (>= 2.13-4) IIRC. See #629670. Should libc6 add a Breaks for this (to help with the upgrade path from squeeze)? Thanks for figuring it out. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620093359.GC28282@elie
