On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:06:15 +0200
[email protected] wrote:

> Those are leftover from my http://bugs.debian.org/630314 patch.  Given
> their nature, I suppose you overlooked them ?

No. I did not. I explained why those were not accepted in the bug
report.

> If patches to the pod/manpage are not the prefered way to ship documentation
> within the package, I'm open to suggestions.  Debian tools usually use 
> Docbook,
> but that's a bit heavyweight on the doc writer.  What about Asciidoc ?

Use the Wiki as already requested numerous times. Your changes are
inconsequential, inaccurate and unacceptable.

-- 


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

Attachment: pgpTwBaW2NJiS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to