On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:55:59AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:17PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > <snip/> > > > Personally, I think that a tool which does emulated configuration of a > > > rootfs is and should be entirely separate from multistrap. I don't > > > think polystrap is the right name either, it isn't about the > > > bootstrapping, it's about configuration under emulation. I have never > > > wanted to rely on emulation and I want no part of such support. > > > > I'm really bad at choosing names. I would be really glad if somebody > > could suggest one that is fitting better. > > fbf > > foreign bootstrap finisher
On second thought: Polystrap is a foreign bootstrap builder and finisher, fbbf Groeten Geert Stappers -- http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/FBBF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
