Hello, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 08:12:28AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > let me try to pick up this topic again and lets hope I dont mess up > somewhere because this thread is already a bit old :)
Well, I have left this issue aside as well in the last months... > with respect to qtmoko, can we reevaluate the current situation? ... so I will have to take the time for this too, but this may have to wait a bit. > > As for ldconfig, it may just be failing because I have a > > ./sbin/ldconfig.REAL here, but to better understand, I'd need some > > background about *why* these backups are taken, and *who* is supposed > > to mess with those files, which we don't want to. Could you add a > > small comment nearby in the script to make it clear ? > > fakechroot can't handle statically linked binaries so it is replaced by > a dummy instead > > same thing is done for ldd which is not replaced by a dummy but by a > perl script using objdump to emulate ldd's behavior. Oh, I now see default/root/. I'll have to see why it was not used in my runs. Best regards, -- Yann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
