Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I do not see this message archived at debian-esperanto. I think I send > it, but I am resending it just in case something was wrong.
Mi ne jam vidis vian mesaÄon. > My (blind) guess was that it can be fixed just adding eo_EO to the list > of supported locales in the locales-supported.dpatch file. Seems that > __SUPPORTED_LOCALES__ value is written to locales.config at some time of > the glibc build process by debian/locales.mk (and is not any internal > glibc variable as I thought before), so that will result in a full and > recent locales list to be written to the locales.config file. > > I think a simple wishlist bug "Please add esperanto locale to the list > of supported locales" does suffice for that. Do I file it? Jes, bonvolu fari. Tamen, estu ne nur eo_EO ISO-8859-3 sed ankaÅ: eo_EO.UTF-8 UTF-8 AÅ kun XX; vidu sube. > Some time ago I was googling a bit about that, and I vaguely remember > that some people even proposed a plain "eo" for that, (I do not know if > that will activate LC_CTYPE and LC_COLLATE or a country definition is > needed for that). If a plain "eo" is not possible or desirable, I also > find eo_XX better than eo_EO, but I would not change this until glibc > upstream has made a choice. Mi suspektas, ke la glibc-uloj faros nenion baldaÅ, do indas rigardi, kion faras la xfree86-uloj. > My knowledge about glibc is small, but I guess adding esperanto to the > locales alias file in any of both forms, and another alias as the other > might suffice. Something like > > esperanto eo_EO.ISO-8859-3 > eo_XX eo_EO.ISO-8859-3 Tion mi ne celis. Mi celis akcepti kaj "eo_EO" kaj "eo_XX" kiel ekvivalentojn. Tio estus utila dum la nuna konfuzo pri tio. Edmundo
