Hi, On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 02:29:12PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Correct, the red will look a little bit different than on the screen, > same for green and blue. So what? There are different red's on the > screen for the swirl anyway.
i talked with one from kde doing the kde graphics for them (or did whatever). and what she says it basically what holds true here as well: if people want to keep this hackerish style and the amateurism they can stick to RGB tools like gimp, but if you want to be somewhere near a good quality prodcut you can't avoid using photoshop/etc. but for some good looking is not as important as principles. i mean nothing against principles but if something can't offer a certain quality we don't have to rape other tools to accomplish this. if one is doing some technical slides, documentation with latex that's fine, but if you want to be eye catching and something looking really good you have to go to the dark side. at least now. so, well, i'ld choose quality despite the non-freeness of the software over the principles. the mess with the previous one was that the photoshop file wasn't made available. if we care about that the whole point isn't that unfortunate any more, despite the non-freeness. and if there is some sort of equivalent product which can deal with CYMK, etc. natively in a quasi-professional environment, let's swap then, or whatever. so, joey is pretty much inclined using it, so we will have to stick to our hackerish style. so long Othmar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
