Le jeu 22/05/2003 � 13:39, Andreas Tille a �crit : > On Thu, 22 May 2003, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > I heard that there will be several Debian-related activities at LSM 2003. > > Who is in charge of its coordination? > Damn, they perfectly managed to hide this event from the interested public by > > a) not announcing it (at least not enough - see below) It was announced in France.
> b) finding the same date as LinuxTag LinuxTag and LSM do not have the same public. > > In January this year I asked former organizers from LSM in Bordeaux for a > conference this year. The only answer was that the people who did the real > work just burned out. I just told them that I regard the LSM as a real > important event and it would be a shame if it would not be held. That > was my last information. Yes, and it was true. In march, things changed and it became possible to organise the LSM in Metz. > They did put a hint on their web page about a changed location. I have to > admit that I have heard about "some kind of event in Metz" but no words > about the continuation of LSM tradition. Well, on http://lsm.abul.org/home.php3?langnew=en is written "LSM 2003 will be held in Metz". > The fact that they just choose the same date as LinuxTag now disables me to > join even if I would really like to take part in LSM. :-((( Reality is cruel. ;-) For a lot of reasons, we had the choice between: no LSM and LSM at the same date than LinuxTag. As the public of the two meetings is not the same, I have little problem with this conflict. > If I look at the schedule I do not find any concrete facts and thus I wonder > whether they should try to shift the date to some date which does not conflict > with LinuxTag. ??? http://rencontresmondiales.org/program/ http://rencontresmondiales.org/program/calendrier.html This is not concrete? ;-) Best regards, Ludovic
