Martin Schulze wrote: > > I'm not an expert in such things, but once talked some guys at our > > university doing such stuff. IIRC you should not let people the > > possibilitie of a neutral field, to force them to decide between good / > > bad. Therefore I would recommend to only use four checkboxes by the > > first questions. > > Not sure how useful it is not to be able to rate a talk "ok" in three > categories, but if it is wished, the list can be reduced to four > boxes, of course.
I was reminded that 1..5 was 1..4 acceptable and 5 totally off the road. Alternatively we could use 1..6 so people can rate 3=it's ok and 4=not really The current form is here: http://people.debian.org/~joey/debian-feedback.ps Regards, Joey -- A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems. Paul Erd�s -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
