Yes, that may work, but I'd rather have a lesser netstat, and use iptables than vica versa. IMHO I'm finding iptables a little easier to understand rather than ipchains(+ ipmasqadm).
I think I'll try the /proc/net/ip_connect... suggestion on monday. Thanks. Cory On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:58:50PM -0500, Jim Crilly wrote: > > You should have read Cory's email more carefully. He was asking about > > netstat showing masq'ed connections under 2.4 w/ iptables, and not 2.2. > > He was also asking about the unstable/sid version of netstat, not the > > version of netstat in stable/potato. > > Sorry, you're right. > > I also made the assumption that if the stable/potato version had the ability > the unstable/sid version would too. > > If Cory had ipchains compatibility compiled in would that allow netstat -M to > work as if he was using ipchains? A temporary work around until netstat gets > updated? > > > > > -- > > Salman Ahmed > > ssahmed AT pathcom DOT com > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Help protect your rights on-line. > Join the Electronic Frontiers Foundation today: http://www.eff.org/join > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > the death of one is a tragedy, the death of millions is just a statistic > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
