On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:36:40PM -0500, Jason Stechschulte wrote: > > My question: > > Is ipmasq really worth using? It almost seems more difficult keeping > > track of multiple .rul files, plus ipmasq has many .def files that seem > > to set up rules also. From the looks of it, it seems like it may be > > easier to just set it all up manually myself and have full control over > > everything rather than having to learn to do things the ipmasq way. > > That's exactly my experience with ipmasq. > My personal favourite is now ferm (apt-cache show ferm) > It's a language of its own, relatively powerful, which translates either > to iptables, ipchains or ipfwadm (not fully supported iirc) commands > which are executed. >
Does it produce a good iptables ruleset? For instance: does it use basic iptables-only features such as stateful filtering? -- Tzafrir Cohen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir
