On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Alexander Clouter wrote: > On Jan 17, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > > This all spells too much "bleeding edge" to me. I also had problems > > applying those patches on kernel 2.4.17. Has anybody got this > > configuration built and working for some time (with a resonably recent 2.4 > > kernel)? > > > like the one I have done? :)My patch applies to a vanilla 2.4.17 and is: > linux-2.4.17-newnat-crypto-qos-xfs.patch.bz2 > > where various useful bits (except for BoFH features ;) ) from the newnat > package have been installed, including h323patch.crypto is the loop-iv > patch for the kernel so crypto graphic filing systems work on any device and > with the cryptoapi package, qos is the WRR/HBQ queues added and xfs is > obviously the XFS filing system. > > however you might say you don't want all these things, well lucky for you if > you don't turn them on they don't do anything :) > > this patch I have been running for some time on the flat server and my laptop > and have had no problems.Its 900k but I'm sure you will cope :) >
Please do. Xfs is not something I need now (ext3 is enough for what I need), but I wanted be able to apply kernel-patch-int on the latest 2.4 > As new kernel versions come out I usually make the new patch, I now know > where it all goes....crazy and needs my mannual touches :)The last thing I > wanted to try and put in this is the grsecurity patch, however due to a bunch > of clashing ID codes XFS + grsec = unhappy segfaulting kernel :( > Another suggetstion: freeswan. -- Tzafrir Cohen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir
