What I merant was that spammers don't connect to user agents *directly*,
instead they only use MTAs. So you only have to protect the MTA and maby
any [1]outgoing smtp.
1. So that your network won't be causing spam.
--- Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:16:53 -0700 (PDT), Mike wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> ..<OT snip>
>
> > So what your asking for is a device that will destroy the network thus
> > preventing spam. I think a full nat setup would be overkill as most
> > spammers don't yet exployt user agents, just MTAs.
>
> ..ah, that explains _everything_, this qualifies Microsoft
> Outlook et al running on Wintendo, as MTA's. ;-)
>
>
> --
> ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
> ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
> Scenarios always come in sets of three:
> best case, worst case, and just in case.
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
