Yes - but iirc the initial need to run 2 name servers was to offer 2 views. Using bind9 serving internal and external one one name server (and a secondary slave perhaps) should provide the require results.
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 09:21, Siraj 'Sid' Rakhada wrote: > --On Wednesday, June 9, 2004 8:42 am +0100 Andrew Porter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 01:14, hanasaki wrote: > >> Hi, no mx records are in the internal server. I need to leverage the > >> external dns as much as possible. It is a real pain to keep the two > >> synchronized with diff IPs for the same hosts and mx's. > > > > I am led to believe that bind 9 has this sort of functionality built in > > (though I have not tried it myself) > > I believe you are talking about bind 'views'. For that you will still > require to keep DNS up to date, and separate out the internal and external > records/zones I thought? The only gain you have is that you only have to > run one DNS server? > > Sid > -- > http://www.mindless.co.uk/~sr for personal site > http://www.gadgetvillage.co.uk/ for gadgets and toys > http://www.abbynet.co.uk/ for networking >
