Hello,
Pokotilenko Kostik a écrit :
I'm trying to settle routing with iptables. I have a router with 2 Inet
connections, and I need routing decision upon source IP.
# iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j ROUTE --oif eth0
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
#
So, what's wrong?
# uname -a
Linux casper 2.6.8-2-686 #1 Thu May 19 17:53:30 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
ROUTE is not a standard target included in the mainstream kernel. It is
an extension from the patch-o-matic-ng. Is your kernel compiled with the
ROUTE patch from the patch-o-matic-ng ?
It's Debian Sarge.
So I guess iptables version is 1.2.11 which includes support for the
ROUTE target (but not for the --tee option).
However, I wonder why you want to use iptables' ROUTE instead of classic
advanced routing (ip rule + alternate routing table) :
ip rule add from 10.0.0.0/8 lookup <alt_table_number_or_name>
ip route add default dev eth0 table <alt_table_number_or_name>
Phil :
Why are you talking about a built-in target ? Many standard targets are
not built-in but extensions : REJECT, LOG, MARK, DNAT, SNAT... By the
way, REJECT is not a built-in target.
Stanislav :
AFAIK the ROUTE target has never been included in the mainstream kernel
sources yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
