On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Phil Dyer wrote: > On 8/11/2007 5:18 PM, Leonardo Boselli wrote: > I tried to trim this as best i could. :) > First, using dhcp to assign gateways based on service isn't going to > work. I think the cheap, fairly reliable solution is to set a single > router with 2 (or more) interfaces. One for each DSL connection. Let > iptables on the router handle the routing issues.
Your best is not enought for me. There are three difficulties: 1. using a single router would set a single point of failure, that is one thing I want to avoid; 2. the two groups of computer are separated and connected via a bridge, using an old 10base2 cable that has a bandwidth even less than the bandwidth of each of the links. Improving that one would cost me more than what i plan to spend. keeping it would not work if two computer from the satellite subnet are in use and the router is the other way .... 3. using a line for each group of service would not fit for me: here i could have one computer tht is connected to another, possibly using the same service, needing all that it can get. of course if i separate the two links by service it would not work for this that is the most frequent case i need bandwidth. ... stil waiting for help ! (the most noticeable problem is, aftersome personal replies: i could set the power user' computer using two ip one having as a router router A and the other router B. For service such sftp where there is the option to bind to a particular addres is easy, but for program such ftp, or just apt-get how to tell for each connection what link to use [someone suggested to set up one connection, then chage the ruls on the nat device to use the other .... but i am not comfortable on it !]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
