On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:55:53 +0200, Pascal Hambourg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Julien Vehent a écrit : >> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:33:13 +0100, Chris Haynes <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> $ sudo iptables -v -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT >>> --to-port 8080 >>> REDIRECT tcp opt -- in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80 redir >>> ports 8080 >>> iptables: No chain/target/match by that name >> >> Has the sage would say, RTFM. If you had, you would have noticed that >> you missed an "s" at --to-ports :p > > If that was the problem, the error message would be different. > Actually the full option name is not required. An iptables option name > can be shortened if it does not conflict with another. "--to-ports" can > be shortened to "--to".
... You're right, the "--to-port" argument works fine. I should probably go slap myself for being cocky. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0b83c2ec7995057742e0f618f3668...@localhost
