funny report. what do you expect? please provide the relevant source as documented in /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.0/README.Bugs.gz.
Gabor Lenart writes: > Package: gcc-3.0 > Version: 1:3.0-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi! > > I'm Gabor Lenart from Hungary and we're developing a movie player software > for Linux. We tried to compile and benchmark mplayer (our player) with both > of gcc 3.0 and gcc 2.95. We found out that gcc 3.0 produces SLOWER and BIGGER > code than 2.95. Is it normal? If it is, I will refuse to use gcc 3.0 since > I need maximum speed, since on my AMD K6-2 DVD playback is a very CPU > sensitive situation. > > Bye, Gabor > > -- System Information > Debian Release: testing/unstable > Kernel Version: Linux vega 2.2.19 #1 Wed Apr 4 14:41:06 CEST 2001 i686 > unknown > > Versions of the packages gcc-3.0 depends on: > ii cpp-3.0 3.0-2 The GNU C preprocessor. > ii gcc-3.0-base 3.0-2 The GNU compiler collection (base package). > ii libgcc1 3.0-2 GCC support library. > ii binutils 2.11.90.0.7-2 The GNU assembler, linker and binary > utiliti > ii libc6 2.2.3-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and > Timezone > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
