Anthony Towns writes: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Christopher C. Chimelis writes: > > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > I don't like the current situation. we have a gcc version in woody > > > > that should be removed and version in sid, which doesn't > > > > propagate. > > > What's the hold-up on the sid->woody move for gcc-3.0 (I haven't seen > > > update-excuses yet)? I can't think of any reason to keep the version in > > > woody around at all... > > out of date on sparc: cpp-3.0-doc, g77-3.0-doc, gcc-3.0-base, > gcc-3.0-doc, libstdc++3-doc (from 3.0.1.ds0-0pre010721) > > Those debs also don't appear to be built anymore? Is that a mistake or should > they be removed too?
The latest version is 3.0.1.ds0-0pre010721 (now in incoming 3.0.1.ds0-0pre010723), which is built for i386 only. > Also the i386 debs seem to be out of date (also, the i386 autobuilder > is hung atm). strange. the i386 debs are up to date at the moment.
