2010/8/23, Pierre Habouzit <madco...@madism.org>: > It's just that LTO isn't that a compelling reason, it's not 100% > production ready. The plugin infrastructure is though. But you're citing > dragonegg, and last time I checked, you had to patch gcc to export one > more symbol. If you haven't applied that patch (if it's still required) > your argument is moot. But I agree the plugin infrastructure *is* a > compelling reason.
dragonegg doesn't need to patch GCC anymore. Plus there is a "2.7" release. Arthur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimeko3vrkon_1e=xq-9lv4umrw=fqqwtbips...@mail.gmail.com
