On 17.07.2018 12:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Matthias! > > On 07/16/2018 05:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I understand that port maintainers want to have their port included as a >> release >> architecture, however it becomes a burden if neither the upstream nor the >> Debian >> port maintainers can keep up with the general upstream development. Maybe we >> need something in between the alternatives of being a release arch or not, >> having the benefit of packages in testing/stable, but not being supported in >> a >> release. > > Care to elaborate what you are referring to? At least for powerpc, ppc64 and > sparc64, gcc seems well enough maintained that bugs get fixed in a reasonable > amount of time.
I was only looking at release architectures.
