On 16.03.19 18:37, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 11.03.19 18:47, Santiago Vila wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> I have no clue, I have never seen that before, and it seems to work fine 
>>>> on the
>>>> buildds, and in the cross-toolchain-base* package's autopkg test.  
>>>> Starting here
>>>> a build with -j1 to see if it's reproducible.
>>>> Is this seen with gcc-7-cross and gcc-9-cross as well?
>>> It happened to me with the (now removed) gcc-7-cross as well, yes.
>>> In case it helps, these are the logs I had in my last backup:
>>> https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/gcc-7-cross/
>>> (Never tried gcc-9-cross yet because my usual target is testing and
>>> sometimes sid).
>> a gcc-9 build with -j1 succeeds.  I'm not spending more time on this.
> I'm confused. What do you mean by "a gcc-9 build"?
> Did you try to build gcc-9-cross instead of gcc-8-cross, which is the
> package in the bug report?

gcc-9-cross, yes.

Reply via email to