On 16.03.19 18:37, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 11.03.19 18:47, Santiago Vila wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> >>>> I have no clue, I have never seen that before, and it seems to work fine >>>> on the >>>> buildds, and in the cross-toolchain-base* package's autopkg test. >>>> Starting here >>>> a build with -j1 to see if it's reproducible. >>>> >>>> Is this seen with gcc-7-cross and gcc-9-cross as well? >>> >>> It happened to me with the (now removed) gcc-7-cross as well, yes. >>> In case it helps, these are the logs I had in my last backup: >>> >>> https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/gcc-7-cross/ >>> >>> (Never tried gcc-9-cross yet because my usual target is testing and >>> sometimes sid). >> >> a gcc-9 build with -j1 succeeds. I'm not spending more time on this. > > I'm confused. What do you mean by "a gcc-9 build"? > > Did you try to build gcc-9-cross instead of gcc-8-cross, which is the > package in the bug report?